May 11, 2007 6:30 am Email to a Friend
James Hartman on Jun 02, 2007 12:42 am
Even if smoking give a movie an immediate "R", why should smokers care? By law, aren't all of you people at least 17 years old (the age to get into said R movie)?
A non-smoker, but I agree, smoking adds a certian feel to the movie, much like the language. Smoking movies should not get a PG rating, but should still be allowed, just like language.
This is completly absurd! What's next, red meat? Maybe then they should ban Church on film. Or maybe since the actual existance of humans on the planet, harms the environment, we should ban humans on screen, then the only thing on the screen would be fictitious, fuzzy-wuzzy creatures who lecture us on how to be better people! Come on! Besides, last I checked, smoking tobacco was still legal. This comes from an ex-smoker by the way.
* = required field
Brit on Mar 23, 2008 10:27 pm
Smoking should be a factor when determining ratings; it's already known that young adults exposed to smoking in movies are more likely to smoke themselves.