| Author |
Message |
Search found 1270 matches |
| Posted: |
Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:09 pm |
| Forum: |
Roll Your Own |
| Subject: |
They're on to the "pipe" tobacco |
runamok
Replies: 15
Views: 280 |
Another thought:
What's to keep the pipe and tobacco companies from colluding on a pipe and 'pipe-cut' tobacco combination that exactly (or very closely) mimics the cigarette smoking experience? I' ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:56 pm |
| Forum: |
Roll Your Own |
| Subject: |
They're on to the "pipe" tobacco |
runamok
Replies: 15
Views: 280 |
A second reading of one of those stories turned up this gem that I missed on the first scan:
But both the Obama administration and some in Congress say they'll try to come up with a distinction bet ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:07 pm |
| Forum: |
Roll Your Own |
| Subject: |
They're on to the "pipe" tobacco |
runamok
Replies: 15
Views: 280 |
The pipe smokers, who, by and large, have worked hard to seperate their high-brow tobacco consumption from that of the lowly cigarette addict (didn't hear of many pipe smokers who rallied against the ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:15 am |
| Forum: |
Roll Your Own |
| Subject: |
They're on to the "pipe" tobacco |
runamok
Replies: 15
Views: 280 |
http://www.bnd.com/business/story/1014090.html
Snip:
"If the companies won't do what is right, then we will," said Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., a reliably anti-tobacco voice in Congr ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:15 am |
| Forum: |
News |
| Subject: |
Football is dangerous, so why not denormalize it? |
runamok
Replies: 22
Views: 1231 |
I don't put any stock whatsoever into the cell phone/tumor correlation that the alarmists have cooked up in some, undoubtedly, bullshit study.
Everybody always looks for a villain when they come do ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:55 pm |
| Forum: |
News |
| Subject: |
Football is dangerous, so why not denormalize it? |
runamok
Replies: 22
Views: 1231 |
There is NO MONEY in denormalizing football or demonizing the 'industry'. |
| |
| Posted: |
Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:52 pm |
| Forum: |
News |
| Subject: |
Use pot or cocaine? No problem. Use tobacco? Problem. |
runamok
Replies: 11
Views: 537 |
I would rather tell the truth and pay the extra money than lie and have to live in fear that the insurance company will find out I lied and deny all future claims.
When the difference in premiums is, ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:12 pm |
| Forum: |
Smoking Bans |
| Subject: |
Re: Try this... |
runamok
Replies: 3
Views: 153 |
Think anyone would stand for this statement with a replacement word in it? Why should we?!
Because we have no numbers and we have no money.
Smokers are an easy mark for taxation and all manner of ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:04 pm |
| Forum: |
Smoking Bans |
| Subject: |
College Campus Bans |
runamok
Replies: 7
Views: 728 |
I want to see statistics for how many college students had ill effects from passing through 2nd hand smoke outside of a building. The PPM of any toxin in the great outside has to be significantly dil ... |
| |
| Posted: |
Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:05 am |
| Forum: |
News |
| Subject: |
Use pot or cocaine? No problem. Use tobacco? Problem. |
runamok
Replies: 11
Views: 537 |
This is an obvious ploy to, once again, get smokers to subsidize everyone else.
Even abstaining for a couple weeks before going in for your "insurance premium assessment" (peeing in a cup ... |
| |
