Post Reply

Forum Index   >   Smokers Rights   >   Ban smoking? Then ban it all!   >   Post a New Reply

Share/Bookmark this Topic: Digg it Stumble it Submit to Del.icio.us Reddit it Facebook it Blink it Slashdot it Linkagogo it 
Message Author
by garhkal on Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:50 am
You are like many i know. The oldest relative i had was a 1 1/2 pack a day smoker from 15 till he hit his late 50s and quit cause he could no longer afford it. I have had several die 10 years or so YOUNGER than him who WERE not smokers...
garhkal Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 278
Back to top
 
by Smoker Sympathizer on Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:46 am
Pete Gatti wrote:


Thing is, I've not suffered any consequences from indulging my pleasures. By healthist standards I do just about everything wrong, eating the wrong foods but especially my smoking. And yet I'm healthy, the proper weight and never been in a hospital. So what in the hell can the health nazi's offer me if I changed my evil ways? What, 3 more drooling years?


That's right, and they can't stand the fact that you're not crawling on all fours grateful for those three more drooling years. I really believe they don't factor quality of life into the equation at all and can't understand why anyone would. It's a blind spot to them, and since they can't win you over with what they're offering, they try to do it with coercion. As for me I see the following all the time and it drives me nuts: people using moral words to describe what should be neutral at worst lifestyle options. For example, "I was bad today; I had cake" or "smoking is wrong". Excuse me. Robbing a bank is bad. Murdering is wrong. Shooting up a school or workplace is wrong. For people to assign such morality to eating and smoking is not only stupid but disrespectful to the victims of actual wrongs. That's my two cents anyway.

Even though I'm still young, I'm having a hard time in modern society because I analyze everything and grind it down and usually end up with a non-mainstream view. Ah, well, maybe history will exonerate my opinions.
Smoker Sympathizer Toker
Toker Joined: Jul 19, 2009 Posts: 86
Back to top
 
by libertarian99 on Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:53 pm
Smoker Sympathizer wrote:
As for me I see the following all the time and it drives me nuts: people using moral words to describe what should be neutral at worst lifestyle options. For example, "I was bad today; I had cake" or "smoking is wrong". Excuse me. Robbing a bank is bad. Murdering is wrong. Shooting up a school or workplace is wrong. For people to assign such morality to eating and smoking is not only stupid but disrespectful to the victims of actual wrongs. That's my two cents anyway.
I grew up in the Catholic Church, and one thing that irritated and annoyed me was when people gave up idiotic things for Lent, like candy or Cokes.

If Jesus did exist, why on Earth would he care whether or not someone ate candy or drank Cokes for a month? Who got any real benefit from this "sacrifice?" No one! It was like making up sins when you went to Confession; as long as you were following the ritual, no one really noticed that your behavior was irrational and pointless.

Assigning moral connotations to food, alcohol and tobacco use came from religion, based on the idea that some chemicals are pure, others are impure, and you owe it to God to keep the impure ones out of your system because your body actually belongs to God, not you. Also, if you have ever fasted or followed a stringent diet for any length of time, you may notice the experience can impart a feeling of moral superiority and inner strength, almost like a religious experience in and of itself.

Religious people tend to deeply distrust anything associated with physical pleasure. The compulsion to seek out pleasurable experiences is sort of built into the human body; without it, people would have no motivation to eat or reproduce. Yet the pursuit of pleasure often drives people to do irrational, destructive things, such as ruining a long-term marriage for the sake of a little sex. People fear that kind of destruction, so they make laws and impose social sanctions on those who fail to exercise what they feel is an appropriate level of self-restraint.
libertarian99 Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: May 01, 2009 Posts: 453
Back to top
 
by Smoker Sympathizer on Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:27 pm
libertarian99 wrote:
Smoker Sympathizer wrote:
As for me I see the following all the time and it drives me nuts: people using moral words to describe what should be neutral at worst lifestyle options. For example, "I was bad today; I had cake" or "smoking is wrong". Excuse me. Robbing a bank is bad. Murdering is wrong. Shooting up a school or workplace is wrong. For people to assign such morality to eating and smoking is not only stupid but disrespectful to the victims of actual wrongs. That's my two cents anyway.
I grew up in the Catholic Church, and one thing that irritated and annoyed me was when people gave up idiotic things for Lent, like candy or Cokes.

If Jesus did exist, why on Earth would he care whether or not someone ate candy or drank Cokes for a month? Who got any real benefit from this "sacrifice?" No one! It was like making up sins when you went to Confession; as long as you were following the ritual, no one really noticed that your behavior was irrational and pointless.

Assigning moral connotations to food, alcohol and tobacco use came from religion, based on the idea that some chemicals are pure, others are impure, and you owe it to God to keep the impure ones out of your system because your body actually belongs to God, not you. Also, if you have ever fasted or followed a stringent diet for any length of time, you may notice the experience can impart a feeling of moral superiority and inner strength, almost like a religious experience in and of itself.

Religious people tend to deeply distrust anything associated with physical pleasure. The compulsion to seek out pleasurable experiences is sort of built into the human body; without it, people would have no motivation to eat or reproduce. Yet the pursuit of pleasure often drives people to do irrational, destructive things, such as ruining a long-term marriage for the sake of a little sex. People fear that kind of destruction, so they make laws and impose social sanctions on those who fail to exercise what they feel is an appropriate level of self-restraint.


You are so right Libertarian. I also grew up in the Catholic Church. I still am Catholic but not as devout as I should be. I also never understood the "give up for Lent thing". Why does it have to be something one enjoys? Why can it not be; "I'm going to give up my impatience" or "I'm going to be more helpful to my family" or "I'm going to carve some time out to volunteer." I don't fast anymore, but when I did do it very occasionally, the whole time I was very hungry and all I could think about was when I could stop fasting. I was useless. I believe it said the Bible that what goes into a person's mouth is nowhere near as important as what comes out it. I remember this quote sometimes when I have a healthy slice of cake while others are wringing their hands about a tiny slice. It seems stuff like this has put modern people on the track to a small life. They're so caught up in the stuff that doesn't really matter that they miss the stuff that does.
Smoker Sympathizer Toker
Toker Joined: Jul 19, 2009 Posts: 86
Back to top
 
by Pete Gatti on Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:28 am
Smoker Sympathizer wrote:


Even though I'm still young, I'm having a hard time in modern society because I analyze everything and grind it down and usually end up with a non-mainstream view. Ah, well, maybe history will exonerate my opinions.


Trust me, it sure beats "ignorance is bliss." At least you won't be thrown into a state of shock when the real shit hits the fan.
Pete Gatti Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: Mar 26, 2009 Posts: 218 Location: Dade City, Florida
Back to top
 
by Smoker Sympathizer on Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:28 am
Pete Gatti wrote:
Smoker Sympathizer wrote:


Even though I'm still young, I'm having a hard time in modern society because I analyze everything and grind it down and usually end up with a non-mainstream view. Ah, well, maybe history will exonerate my opinions.


Trust me, it sure beats "ignorance is bliss." At least you won't be thrown into a state of shock when the real shit hits the fan.


True enough. Metaphorically speaking, the "ignorance is bliss" crowd will be caught in a flood without a boat. Just out of curiousity, when you refer to the shit hitting the fan, do you think things will get better or worse?
Smoker Sympathizer Toker
Toker Joined: Jul 19, 2009 Posts: 86
Back to top
 
by Pete Gatti on Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:01 pm
Smoker Sympathizer wrote:


True enough. Metaphorically speaking, the "ignorance is bliss" crowd will be caught in a flood without a boat. Just out of curiousity, when you refer to the shit hitting the fan, do you think things will get better or worse?


With anti-fat and global warming as expanded feeding grounds for these thugs, things will get a lot worse and I hate to spring this on you, but there's is no guarantee it will ever return to being better. It all depends on how much shit people are willing to eat before joining us in saying "ENOUGH!!!!!"
Pete Gatti Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: Mar 26, 2009 Posts: 218 Location: Dade City, Florida
Back to top
 
by garhkal on Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:38 pm
And even then, i feel the power has swung so far in their side, that even if we all say enough is enough, it won't matter.
garhkal Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 278
Back to top
 
by Pete Gatti on Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:33 pm
garhkal wrote:
And even then, i feel the power has swung so far in their side, that even if we all say enough is enough, it won't matter.


I haven't reached that point yet. Thus far the power comes from a majority who believe the lies and propaganda.
Pete Gatti Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: Mar 26, 2009 Posts: 218 Location: Dade City, Florida
Back to top
 
by Smoker Sympathizer on Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:35 am
I think people have given up their power to the "experts" who are supposedly supposed to know what's best. So when something flies in the face of common sense, it's the ordinary person who feels like they must be wrong since they're not the ones with alphabet soup after their name.

Also I think it's hard enough to fight for something when one really believes he/she is right, let alone when conditioned to believe that anyone who disagrees with the experts is an idiot.

They tend to target people who believe their abuse is deserved (smokers, obese) that way they don't fight back. It the victims grew a set and started calling people out for hate speech and harassment, I think we'd see a change.
Smoker Sympathizer Toker
Toker Joined: Jul 19, 2009 Posts: 86
Back to top
 


All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 3 of 5
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next