| |
|
|
Share/Bookmark this Topic:
|
| Message |
Author |
by jcleitz
on Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:46 am |
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070423/ap_on_he_me/diet_obesity_costs
Quote: CHICAGO - Overweight workers cost their bosses more in injury claims than their lean colleagues, suggests a study that found the heaviest employees had twice the rate of workers' compensation claims as their fit co-workers.
Obesity experts said they hope the study will convince employers to invest in programs to help fight obesity. One employment attorney warned companies that treating fat workers differently could lead to discrimination complaints.
Duke University researchers also found that the fattest workers had 13 times more lost workdays due to work-related injuries, and their medical claims for those injuries were seven times higher than their fit co-workers.
Overweight workers were more likely to have claims involving injuries to the back, wrist, arm, neck, shoulder, hip, knee and foot than other employees.
The findings were based on eight years of data from 11,728 people employed by Duke and its health system. Researchers found that workers with higher body mass indexes, or BMIs, had higher rates of workers' compensation claims.
The most obese workers — those with BMIs of 40 or higher — had the highest rates of claims and lost workdays. BMI is a measure of height and weight. A 6-foot, 300-pound person, for example, has a BMI of just over 40.
Study co-author Dr. Truls Ostbye said the findings should encourage employers to sponsor fitness programs.
"There are many promising programs," Ostbye said. "We'd like to see more research about what is truly effective."
James Hill, who heads the Center for Human Nutrition at the University of Colorado, said managers will pay attention to the findings because injuries mean more immediate financial losses than the future health-care costs of diabetes and heart disease.
"When you see that claims rates double, I think that's going to get people's attention," Hill said.
But there isn't enough good information about employer-sponsored programs that work, said John Cawley, an expert in the economics of obesity at Cornell University. Employers don't know whether paying for nutrition counseling, obesity surgery or anti-obesity drugs through health insurance makes economic sense, he said.
"It's now apparent to everybody that obesity is a big problem," Cawley said. "But the research isn't there to know where to get biggest bang for the buck."
Cawley noted that BMI does not distinguish muscle from fat and can equate a buff body builder to a couch potato. Although BMI, a measure of height and weight, is used in most obesity research, Cawley's research has found that blacks are particularly likely to be misclassified as obese by BMI.
New York employment attorney Richard Corenthal cautioned employers not to overreact with discriminatory policies.
"Employers need to be careful not to view this study as a green light to treat obese or overweight workers differently," Corenthal said.
The study, appearing in Monday's Archives of Internal Medicine, got funding from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
___
So how about fat smokers? This stuff is such BULLSHIT. Anyone got a BMI calculator? I run/bike/walk 10 miles a day. I bench over 200 pounds and leg press almost 1000. I am 6'1 and weigh 260. CHeck out what my BMI is. I challenge ANYONE to call me obese to my face. Oh, did I mention I smoke a pack a day and I haven't taken a sick day in the 4 years I have been at my job...
Do these thing equate any other factors? How about these people performance results. Are they under paid, cause if I were underpaid I wouldn;t work as hard and take days off. Are they underpaid BECAUSE they are fat? There are so many factors. This is the new hate.... The day they won a lawsuit over HydroxyCut and Trimspa and a couple other the FDA announce a new precription Fat loss drug. Pharma wants in on the market that has been run by companies that dont need precriptions...
[freak] these people.. |
|
|
jcleitz

Enthusiastic Smoker
Joined: Apr 17, 2006
Posts: 450
Location: Jersey
|
| |
Back to top |
|
|
| |
by Torquemeda
on Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:19 pm |
|
Obesity experts said they hope the study will convince employers to invest in programs to help fight obesity.
And just who gets the money from these investments?
Cawley's research has found that blacks are particularly likely to be misclassified as obese by BMI.
I wonder if eventually this whole healthcare craze is going to be used to favor one race over the other? I mean the nazi's did it, and I don't see that big a differance in strategy. Political Correctness, when you get down to it, is stating certain races need more help than others. All you need is the medical community to back that train of thought. Hmmm...who were some of the biggest war criminals from WW2? Doctors.
"Employers need to be careful not to view this study as a green light to treat obese or overweight workers differently," Corenthal said.
What does he think they're going to view it as? This study's claiming people with the "ideal" body mass index are better employees and the others are sub-human or something. |
|
|
Torquemeda

Smoking Lobby Sponsor
Joined: May 23, 2005
Posts: 1087
|
| |
Back to top |
| |
by gregory
on Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:23 am |
|
good point torque.
Quote: I wonder if eventually this whole healthcare craze is going to be used to favor one race over the other? I mean the nazi's did it, and I don't see that big a differance in strategy. Political Correctness, when you get down to it, is stating certain races need more help than others.
I wondered if the anti's would first go after smoking in the home against blacks, since studies show that their children are most affected by SHS. |
|
|
gregory

Enthusiastic Smoker
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 270
Location: America...I think?
|
| |
Back to top |
| |
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
|
|