Post Reply

Forum Index   >   Smokers Rights   >   Would you smoke a nicotine-free cig or a smokeless cig?   >   Post a New Reply

Share/Bookmark this Topic: Digg it Stumble it Submit to Del.icio.us Reddit it Facebook it Blink it Slashdot it Linkagogo it 
Message Author
by Jay on Sun Aug 31, 2003 7:37 am
If you say NO to either part of the Q (particularly the former part), then that means you need your nic fix. A smoker on another site thinks getting nicotine isn't ONE of the main reasons why most smokers smoke. If he was right, then 3 million smokers would all be smoking Quest in this country. If a smoker doesn't smoke for the nicotine part, then you might as well have a Quest cig instead of even a ultra-light cig.
Jay Enthusiastic Smoker
Enthusiastic Smoker Joined: Jun 10, 2003 Posts: 647 Location: Chicago
Back to top
 
by Rick on Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:16 am
Personally, I would not choose a nicotine free cig. They are too expensive to NOT have nicotine in them. The only way I would choose a smoke free cig, would be if we could smoke them in restaurants/bars, movie theaters, dentist's, doctor's office, business offices, etc....... like days gone by, before the mother fucking anti-smoking Nazi's came out of their closets. Then & only in those circumstances, would I choose a smokeless cig.
Rick Smoker
Smoker Joined: Jun 09, 2003 Posts: 124
Back to top
 
by BWilliams on Mon Sep 01, 2003 10:10 am
It's true, why spend the money on the smokeless variety? It's for pussies.
BWilliams Smoking Lobby Sponsor
Smoking Lobby Sponsor Joined: Jun 05, 2003 Posts: 1104 Location: New York City
Back to top
 


All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1